INBOUND ON STEROIDS
Case study · Lemonade
Two founders. Both posting. Running since February.

Both feeds.

Lemonade is a London growth agency with two founders who both publish. The plan runs for the pair of them: both feeds active, posts as either man to his own account, and the comments turned into leads on their list. Running since February 2026.

David Dinsmore, co-founder of Lemonade
David Dinsmore
Billy Mackie, co-founder of Lemonade
Billy Mackie
01
The problem
01 / 05

The two-founder problem.

David and Billy run Lemonade together. Both of them post. Both of them sell. The brand has one point of view, but the two of them do not sound remotely alike, and a feed where they blur into one another is a feed nobody believes.

Keeping two real voices apart, on one shared brand, was the thing that had to be solved before anything else was worth running.

David
Co-founder · his own voice profile

Drafts written as David publish to David's account, on David's schedule.

Billy
Co-founder · his own voice profile

Drafts written as Billy publish to Billy's account, on Billy's schedule.

02
Two voices
02 / 05

Same brand. Two different men.

Pick the author on a post and everything under it follows: the argument stays Lemonade's, the voice is his own.

2
voices, one shared point of view
The brand
Lemonade's shared point of view. What the company argues, what it will never say.
David
His own rhythm, his own tells, his own words, on his own account.
Billy
His own rhythm, his own tells, his own words, on his own account.

Each post goes out on the right account, in the right voice.

03
Lane 1 · Posts
03 / 05

Idea to scheduled post, run for them.

Topics arrive on their own and finished posts go out as the right man. Nothing on their plates.

01
Topics arrive
Every Monday morning the week's industry news is turned into rated suggestions. Their own client calls feed in the arguments they already made out loud, and competitor posts are read for what is working.
02
Written as the right man
The full post is written as David or as Billy, specific to their world, pulling from their own past calls.
03
Published
The post goes out on the right founder's account, at his slot, in his name.
The steering rule they use most. One sentence of direction on a topic changes what gets written. Say nothing and the week goes out anyway, as the right man.
04
Lane 2 · Lead magnets
04 / 05

6 formats, built end to end.

A lead magnet here means the whole thing: the asset itself, the launch post, the email, the page copy, the DM replies and the cover, all delivered together under their brand. Every one exists to earn an email address worth having.

Calculators, checklists, templates

Produced as finished spreadsheets with working formulas, formatting and Lemonade branding. No manual build.

Guides and swipe files

Written, then published as a live resource page on their own domain, cover and capture form included.

Interactive assessments

A self-scoring tool a reader actually completes, which is the version that earns an email address worth having.

When a lead magnet goes live, its launch post goes live with it.

05
Lane 3 · Capture
05 / 05

The comments turn into a list worth selling to.

When a post asks readers to comment for the asset, everyone who does gets it. Then the interesting half of the job starts.

Everyone gets the asset

No reader is left waiting on a founder to send a link by hand.

Each one is graded

Every commenter is graded against their ICP, with the reasoning written down, so a wrong call can be seen and corrected.

Only fits reach the list

The email list stays made of people they would actually want on a call, instead of everyone who ever typed a word.

Since February 2026
Two feeds, running for them.
One list, growing.

Both founders publish without touching it. The lead magnets go live under their brand, the comments turn into graded leads, and the list they sell to keeps growing. Nothing on their plates.

What Lemonade keeps.

Theirs, for good

Both accounts, both audiences, the domain the resources sit on and the email list it all captures. All of it stays theirs.

Handled for them

The topics, the drafting for both men, the lead magnets across six formats, the grading of every commenter. Run for the pair of them since February.

The same plan, run for you.

One founder or two, the plan holds either way. Your name, your brand, your list, and nothing on your plate.

Posts published as you, or as each founder
Lead magnets built end to end, published on your domain
Commenters graded against your ICP before they hit your list
A newsletter working the list your assets capture
Nothing for you to write, design or schedule.
From $2k a month, fixed.
Book a call See the other case studies
Next case study Kyle Hunt